< prev index next >

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/doc-files/ValueBased.html

Print this page
@@ -28,45 +28,51 @@
    <title>Value-based Classes</title>
  </head>
  <body>
  <h1 id="ValueBased">{@index "Value-based Classes"}</h1>
  
- Some classes, such as <code>java.lang.Integer</code> and
- <code>java.time.LocalDate</code>, are <em>value-based</em>.
+ Some classes, such as {@code java.lang.Integer} and
+ {@code java.time.LocalDate}, are <em>value-based</em>.
+ The compiler and runtime enforce the value based properties below if it is declared
+ as {@code value class} and preview features are enabled.
  A value-based class has the following properties:
  <ul>
      <li>the class declares only final instance fields (though these may contain references
          to mutable objects);</li>
-     <li>the class's implementations of <code>equals</code>, <code>hashCode</code>,
-         and <code>toString</code> compute their results solely from the values
+     <li>the class's implementations of {@code equals}, {@code hashCode},
+         and {@code toString} compute their results solely from the values
          of the class's instance fields (and the members of the objects they
          reference), not from the instance's identity;</li>
      <li>the class's methods treat instances as <em>freely substitutable</em>
-         when equal, meaning that interchanging any two instances <code>x</code> and
-         <code>y</code> that are equal according to <code>equals()</code> produces no
+         when equal, meaning that interchanging any two instances {@code x} and
+         {@code y} that are equal according to {@code equals()} produces no
          visible change in the behavior of the class's methods;</li>
      <li>the class performs no synchronization using an instance's monitor;</li>
-     <li>the class does not declare (or has deprecated any) accessible constructors;</li>
+     <li>the class does not declare (or discourages use of) accessible constructors;</li>
      <li>the class does not provide any instance creation mechanism that promises
          a unique identity on each method call&mdash;in particular, any factory
          method's contract must allow for the possibility that if two independently-produced
-         instances are equal according to <code>equals()</code>, they may also be
-         equal according to <code>==</code>;</li>
-     <li>the class is final, and extends either <code>Object</code> or a hierarchy of
-         abstract classes that declare no instance fields or instance initializers
-         and whose constructors are empty.</li>
+         instances are equal according to {@code equals()}, they may also be
+         equal according to {@code ==};</li>
+     <li>the class is final, and extends either {@code Object} or a hierarchy of
+         abstract value classes.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>When two instances of a value-based class are equal (according to `equals`), a program
      should not attempt to distinguish between their identities, whether directly via reference
-     equality or indirectly via an appeal to synchronization, identity hashing,
+     equality {@code ==} or indirectly via an appeal to synchronization, identity hashing,
      serialization, or any other identity-sensitive mechanism.</p>
  
  <p>Synchronization on instances of value-based classes is strongly discouraged,
      because the programmer cannot guarantee exclusive ownership of the
      associated monitor.</p>
  
- <p>Identity-related behavior of value-based classes may change in a future release.
-     For example, synchronization may fail.</p>
+ <p>Identity-related behavior of value-based classes may change when implemented as a value class.
+ </p>
+ <ul>
+     <li>The class may choose to allocate/cache instances differently.
+     <li>The use of the value class for synchronization or with
+     {@linkplain java.lang.ref.Reference object references} result in {@link IdentityException}.
+ </ul>
  
  </body>
  </html>
< prev index next >